Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

Lasius neoniger tests

lasius neoniger testing experiment

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Offline Ants4fun - Posted March 4 2016 - 2:33 PM

Ants4fun

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,142 posts
  • LocationSouth Dakota

I have roughly 40 Lasius neoniger queens. I am going to be doing a variety of tests on them. For example housing, feeding, hibernation, brood boosting, etc. My first test was housing. This isn't completely foolproof as I still had to hydrate the queens with formicariums, thus they were inevitably disturbed. Here are my findings.

 

1zqdpmx.jpg

Test tubes- Queens in test tubes had an average growth rate. I took the queens out all at the same time. Most of the queens have larvae. I noticed that many in test tubes looked comparatively lethargic, however it might be due to their lack of ability to climb glass/plastic well.

 

23rlc41.jpg

 

Formicariums- I had one queen in a THA atom and one in a Byformica Grotube. Keep in mind the one in the Grotube might not be Lasius neoniger, thus not making it a reliable example. The one in the Grotube has very small larvae, while the one in the atom has a small brood pile and no larvae. This is the old atom without nest mates. These surprisingly had an average to low average growth rate. I believe that this is because of the need to fill them with water, thus disturbing them, or perhaps my impatiently checking up on them.

 

2f0cbr7.jpg

Dirt- I out 3-4 queens in dirt test tubes and containers. I was very surprised with the results. The ones in the dirt test tubes with cotton barrier would dry out faster than the ones that had a plastic container with a plastic lid and how's poked in the lid. I used Eco-earth as my dirt. The ones in the test tubes have tunneled away from the side, so I will have to dig them up later, however the one in the plastic container kept part uncovered. Surprisingly, she has many large larvae and pupae, the only pupae observed so far.

 

bgbg4n.jpg

In conclusion: I found that, so far, dirt setups are the best for getting the best results or getting a quick start to a queen. I am not sure if that is new info, or if I'm just stating old facts, but it gives me a lot incentive to use dirt in my test tubes. If the result is a faster growing, healthier colony, then I think that is the way to go for the founding stage. I am going to do some experiments later regarding this. Perhaps I might experiment on whole dirt formicariums vs formicariums with a bit of substrate.

 


Keep this in mind if you want to obtain the best results on hard to start so. Such as Myrmecocystus. Obviously, the results will not be the same, but perhaps similar.


Edited by Ants4fun, March 4 2016 - 2:40 PM.

  • Here for the honeypots likes this

#2 Offline drtrmiller - Posted March 4 2016 - 3:00 PM

drtrmiller

    Vendor

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,714 posts
First, you have a very small sample size. Thus no conclusions can be drawn.

Second, let's assume dirt setups offer some benefit. Since ants do not eat dirt, it must be assumed that it is the environment that is responsible for the growth. Therefore, any setup that closely mimics this environment will offer the same benefit, regardless as to whether it contains dirt.

I would urge anyone to aim for creating an environment that is similar to dirt, without using any dirt, given the obvious downsides, especially for beginners, in terms of being able to easily monitor, adjust, and relocate the colony.

Edited by drtrmiller, March 4 2016 - 3:01 PM.

  • LC3 likes this


byFormica® is the manufacturer of the iconic nectar feeders and Sunburst Ant Nectar.
byFormica ant products always deliver consistent performance, convenience,
and reliability, making them among the most beloved ant foods and kit enjoyed by
ant keeping enthusiasts worldwide. For more information, visit www.byFormica.com.

#3 Offline Ants4fun - Posted March 4 2016 - 3:13 PM

Ants4fun

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,142 posts
  • LocationSouth Dakota
That is sort of what I was getting at. That is why I am going to do testing with formicariums with different substrate. The aim was not to urge beginners to use this it was to urge people with difficult queens to use this. This isn't the only instance to prove that there is a direct causation between having a natural environment and a healthier, prolific colony.

I wouldn't say that no conclusions can be drawn. This might not be a desirable sample size, but the results do say something. I will check up on the other queens in dirt setups right now.

#4 Offline Ants4fun - Posted March 4 2016 - 3:18 PM

Ants4fun

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,142 posts
  • LocationSouth Dakota
Just checked, just as I expected. Even thought they dried out a little, their brood development was much more advanced than test tubes.

#5 Offline Ants4fun - Posted March 4 2016 - 3:20 PM

Ants4fun

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,142 posts
  • LocationSouth Dakota


What I aim to do next is feeding. Despite the small sample size, I aim to try different recommended diets and see what fares better.

Edited by Ants4fun, March 4 2016 - 3:57 PM.


#6 Offline Mads - Posted March 4 2016 - 3:58 PM

Mads

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 84 posts
  • LocationInnisfail, Alberta, Canada

I used damp play sand in pill vials for the L. neoniger queens I caught last fall. Mainly due to the fact that I didn`t have any test tubes handy at the time. I found that all of the queens housed this way had twice to three times as many brood on average than the neoniger queens I housed in traditional test tube set ups in the past.

 

Mads


  • Ants4fun likes this

#7 Offline Bryce - Posted March 4 2016 - 4:15 PM

Bryce

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 101 posts
  • LocationPhoenix Az
The best set up for me a least is a small jar with hystone and a light layer of dirt and sand on top. Here what I use.

Attached Images

  • 1457136848233-1004021152.jpg

  • Ants4fun likes this





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: lasius, neoniger, testing, experiment

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users