Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

Queen Type? (Hopefully it's what I think it is.)


Best Answer dspdrew , March 18 2016 - 8:34 PM

The Queen is actually about 7/16th inches long or 11.5mm

 

I would say M. testaceus then. I think the location and timing makes that pretty clear.

Go to the full post


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Offline Shaye - Posted March 18 2016 - 4:22 PM

Shaye

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 171 posts
  • LocationCalifornia, USA

 

 

About 7/16th inches or 11.5mm long, found in a shallow burrow just now.

Canyon country, CA

Desert sandy area with lots of pebbles

 

If there's any more info needed, or that I easily forgot, please let me know.


Edited by Shaye, March 18 2016 - 7:44 PM.

A question that sometimes drives me hazy: am I or are the others crazy?


#2 Offline dspdrew - Posted March 18 2016 - 4:28 PM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

Maybe Prenolepis imparis, but I don't think they dig founding chambers like that. It might be Myrmecocystus testaceus; they fly this early too. The first picture almost looks as though there is a long maxillary palp showing, but I think that might just be the left antennae. Does this queen have really long maxillary palps?


  • Miles likes this

#3 Offline Miles - Posted March 18 2016 - 4:30 PM

Miles

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 542 posts
  • LocationFlorida & Arizona

Well, what do you think it is? I'm thinking this is Myrmecocystus. It's hard to see much detail in these images. (Edited to reflect additional research)

 

If you can get a better image of her head, specifically her mandibles/face, we can nail this ID.

 

Edit: I'm having a heck of a time getting the edits on this post to work right... I think it's settled now.  :thinking:


Edited by Miles, March 18 2016 - 4:35 PM.


#4 Offline dspdrew - Posted March 18 2016 - 4:44 PM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

Haha I was editing my post like crazy. I must have changed it 20 times. I think I'm happy with it now. I need to read closer before posting sometimes.


  • Miles likes this

#5 Online gcsnelling - Posted March 18 2016 - 5:03 PM

gcsnelling

    Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,692 posts

Looks like Myrmecocystus to me.


  • Bryce likes this

#6 Offline Bryce - Posted March 18 2016 - 7:34 PM

Bryce

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 101 posts
  • LocationPhoenix Az

Looks like Myrmecocystus to me.

+1

#7 Offline Shaye - Posted March 18 2016 - 7:36 PM

Shaye

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 171 posts
  • LocationCalifornia, USA

The Queen is actually about 7/16th inches long or 11.5mm


Edited by Shaye, March 18 2016 - 7:44 PM.

A question that sometimes drives me hazy: am I or are the others crazy?


#8 Offline Mdrogun - Posted March 18 2016 - 7:51 PM

Mdrogun

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 943 posts
  • LocationGainesville, FL

To me it looks a lot more like Myrmecocystus than Prenolepis imparis.


Currently Keeping:
Trachymyrmex septentrionalis

Pheidole pilifera

Forelius sp. (Monogynous, bicolored) "Midwestern Forelius"
Crematogaster cerasi

Pheidole bicarinata

Aphaenogaster rudis

Camponotus chromaiodes

Formica sp. (microgena species)

Nylanderia cf. arenivega


#9 Offline dspdrew - Posted March 18 2016 - 8:34 PM   Best Answer

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

The Queen is actually about 7/16th inches long or 11.5mm

 

I would say M. testaceus then. I think the location and timing makes that pretty clear.


  • gcsnelling likes this




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users