Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

Aphaenogaster fulva supercolony?


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Offline CheetoLord02 - Posted May 28 2020 - 10:58 AM

CheetoLord02

    Vendor

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 781 posts
  • LocationMesa, AZ

Now, before you go rush to tell me about worker-queens, I know. Aphaenogaster rudis-group are notorious for having infertile dealates in their colony that act as workers. This is not about that.

Recently I took a trip to central IL to visit a friend. I had known about an alleged population of polygynous Aphaenogaster fulva present in the woods by him, but I wasn't so sure until I had seen them myself. Now, my local woods also has large populations of this species, and the two populations in the two forests were distinctly different.

My forests' colonies:
-Rarely have multiple dealates in the colony
-Have relatively small colonies (<1000 workers)
-Hibernate with alate larvae
-Are regularly hosts for A. tennesseensis
-Coexist with other Aphaenogaster species

All of that is relatively normal for A. fulva. However, the colonies from central IL are significantly different:
-Multiple dealates present in every colony, some having dozens
-Have massive colonies (some getting over 10k)
-Do not hibernate with alate larvae
-Are not hosts for A. tennesseensis
-Do not coexist with other species of Aphaenogaster

Now, while I'm unable to perform direct fertility testing, I can assume that the population in central IL is genuinely polygynous for a few reasons:
1: While Aphenogaster may have infertile dealates present in the colony, it is usually uncommon in A. fulva, and a single colony would never contain dozens, let alone every colony.
2: Aphaenogaster fulva queens are estimated to only be able to support around 1500 workers by themselves. There is no way a single fertile gyne could support colonies with tens of thousands of workers.
3: Actually, I have no idea what the deal with the alate larvae is. My best guess is that they produce far fewer alates, and potentially breed in the nest or accept newly mated queens into their colonies. This one is a bit of a tossup, though.
4: Polygynous species are not able to be hosts for parasitic species. This can be seen in Lasius, as parasitic Lasius species are unable to use L. brevicornis or L. nearcticus as hosts, as those two species are polygynous. The absence of A. tennesseensis would imply that the A. fulva colonies in central IL do have multiple fertile dealates in the colonies, as a monogynous colony would be subject to parasitism from A. tennesseensis.
5: Normally, Aphaenogaster fulva are incapable of driving out other colonies of Aphaenogaster due to their small colony size. It is very unlikely to only have one species of Aphaenogaster present in one area, as they simply do not take up enough space and/or resources to out compete the other colonies of Aphaenogaster.

Now, after making these claims/assumptions, I decided to collect a colony to observe their behavior (and because well, they seem fun to keep.) Anyways, I collected a colony and was able to obtain around 400 workers, a bunch of larvae, and 17 dealate queens. I moved them into a TarheelAnts Phalanx formicarium and fed them some crickets. Within 12 hours, they had laid a LOT of eggs. Certainly more than any single queen could hope to lay overnight. Take a look:
 

IMG 20200527 222009749

 

Now I've had this colony for less than a week, so who knows what will come of them in the future. I'm excited to see what alates will be like in the colony, since these strangely had no alate larvae present in the nest as I mentioned before. 

One possibility that was brought up to me by AnthonyP163 is that this could be a new/undescribed species. While I find it unlikely, it is an interesting thought, and I'll be sending a worker to him so he can look at it under a microscope and potentially send it in somewhere for even closer imaging. While to the naked eye these ants seem identical to normal A. fulva, it could be a case of a few hairs, or spine length, or something else. I'm really not sure.

Now to wrap it up, here's a video of the colony in all their glory: 


I'm interested to hear any other theories you guys have on these strange ants. Also, should I make a journal on them? I might if they turn out to have any more interesting quirks that I don't see just yet.


Edited by CheetoLord02, August 28 2020 - 8:22 AM.

  • AnthonyP163, TennesseeAnts, Otter and 3 others like this

#2 Offline AntsDakota - Posted May 28 2020 - 11:21 AM

AntsDakota

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,994 posts
  • LocationSioux Falls, South Dakota
I love polygynous species. I’ve heard populations of A. picea are polygynous, and I’m wondering if I could find such populations.
  • Ants_Dakota likes this

"God made..... all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. (including ants) And God saw that it was good. Genesis 1:25 NIV version


#3 Offline AnthonyP163 - Posted May 28 2020 - 10:10 PM

AnthonyP163

    Vendor

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 974 posts
  • LocationWaukesha, Wisconsin.

Looking forward to observing one of these under a microscope.


  • CheetoLord02 likes this


Ant Keeping & Ethology Discord - 2000+ Members and growing

Statesideants.com - order live ants legally in the US

 


#4 Offline CheetoLord02 - Posted June 3 2020 - 10:24 PM

CheetoLord02

    Vendor

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 781 posts
  • LocationMesa, AZ

I have a few updates regarding this population of Aphaenogaster fulva from central IL. The keeper who lives within close proximity of them has given me a bit more insight into them that I wasn't able to see while visiting them, as I only was anting in that forest for a couple of hours.

Regarding the topic of alates which had baffled me before; supposedly these colonies, despite being massive, produce very limited numbers of alates. This makes me inclined to believe that they are inbreeding, if not full-on supercolonious. Attached below is a video taken by my friend last year (July 29, 2019) of an absolutely massive colony of these polygynous A. fulva. Theoretically July would be prime alate season, as it's too early for anything to have flown, but all of the alates would have eclosed, meaning theoretically colonies would have dozens, if not hundreds of alates in the nest. However, in the video, it's seen that there are hardly any alates whatsoever, instead just mountains of brood, workers, and several dealate queens.



This video is infallible proof that these A. fulva are polygynous. It is absolutely impossible for one queen to produce that amount of brood.

Now, to back up the supercolony claim:
We tested this slightly when I was visiting the area by taking workers from one side of the forest and introducing them to a colony from a different part of the forest, and to our surprise the worker was met with no aggression and was quickly adopted into the nest. Everywhere we looked throughout the leaf litter there were foraging workers, suggesting that there could be hidden trails connecting colonies all throughout the forest.

It seems insane even to me to suggest that a traditionally monogynous species would have supercolonies. It's mindblowing to think that some freak of genetics has allowed this specific population to thrive in such a way, and I'm very grateful that I was able to collect a colony to study and keep for myself. I'm interested to see if anyone else has any other ideas regarding this population, or if they've even potentially seen something similar.


  • AnthonyP163, FeedTheAnts, TennesseeAnts and 2 others like this

#5 Offline AntsDakota - Posted June 4 2020 - 6:43 AM

AntsDakota

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,994 posts
  • LocationSioux Falls, South Dakota
Wow........ the only species I’ve seen with more brood in the nest than that is Lasius americanus.
  • Ants_Dakota likes this

"God made..... all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. (including ants) And God saw that it was good. Genesis 1:25 NIV version


#6 Offline TennesseeAnts - Posted June 4 2020 - 7:13 AM

TennesseeAnts

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,920 posts
  • LocationNashville, Tennessee

I have a few updates regarding this population of Aphaenogaster fulva from central IL. The keeper who lives within close proximity of them has given me a bit more insight into them that I wasn't able to see while visiting them, as I only was anting in that forest for a couple of hours.
Regarding the topic of alates which had baffled me before; supposedly these colonies, despite being massive, produce very limited numbers of alates. This makes me inclined to believe that they are inbreeding, if not full-on supercolonious. Attached below is a video taken by my friend last year (July 29, 2019) of an absolutely massive colony of these polygynous A. fulva. Theoretically July would be prime alate season, as it's too early for anything to have flown, but all of the alates would have eclosed, meaning theoretically colonies would have dozens, if not hundreds of alates in the nest. However, in the video, it's seen that there are hardly any alates whatsoever, instead just mountains of brood, workers, and several dealate queens.

This video is infallible proof that these A. fulva are polygynous. It is absolutely impossible for one queen to produce that amount of brood.
Now, to back up the supercolony claim:
We tested this slightly when I was visiting the area by taking workers from one side of the forest and introducing them to a colony from a different part of the forest, and to our surprise the worker was met with no aggression and was quickly adopted into the nest. Everywhere we looked throughout the leaf litter there were foraging workers, suggesting that there could be hidden trails connecting colonies all throughout the forest.
It seems insane even to me to suggest that a traditionally monogynous species would have supercolonies. It's mindblowing to think that some freak of genetics has allowed this specific population to thrive in such a way, and I'm very grateful that I was able to collect a colony to study and keep for myself. I'm interested to see if anyone else has any other ideas regarding this population, or if they've even potentially seen something similar.


I've seen similar occurrences with my local population of Aphaenogaster rudis, although rare. I collected a colony with 11 queens once, and saw the same thing; huge amounts of eggs, many times greater than a single queen could lay.
  • AntsDakota likes this

#7 Offline AntsDakota - Posted June 4 2020 - 9:06 AM

AntsDakota

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,994 posts
  • LocationSioux Falls, South Dakota

I have a few updates regarding this population of Aphaenogaster fulva from central IL. The keeper who lives within close proximity of them has given me a bit more insight into them that I wasn't able to see while visiting them, as I only was anting in that forest for a couple of hours.
Regarding the topic of alates which had baffled me before; supposedly these colonies, despite being massive, produce very limited numbers of alates. This makes me inclined to believe that they are inbreeding, if not full-on supercolonious. Attached below is a video taken by my friend last year (July 29, 2019) of an absolutely massive colony of these polygynous A. fulva. Theoretically July would be prime alate season, as it's too early for anything to have flown, but all of the alates would have eclosed, meaning theoretically colonies would have dozens, if not hundreds of alates in the nest. However, in the video, it's seen that there are hardly any alates whatsoever, instead just mountains of brood, workers, and several dealate queens.
This video is infallible proof that these A. fulva are polygynous. It is absolutely impossible for one queen to produce that amount of brood.
Now, to back up the supercolony claim:
We tested this slightly when I was visiting the area by taking workers from one side of the forest and introducing them to a colony from a different part of the forest, and to our surprise the worker was met with no aggression and was quickly adopted into the nest. Everywhere we looked throughout the leaf litter there were foraging workers, suggesting that there could be hidden trails connecting colonies all throughout the forest.
It seems insane even to me to suggest that a traditionally monogynous species would have supercolonies. It's mindblowing to think that some freak of genetics has allowed this specific population to thrive in such a way, and I'm very grateful that I was able to collect a colony to study and keep for myself. I'm interested to see if anyone else has any other ideas regarding this population, or if they've even potentially seen something similar.


I've seen similar occurrences with my local population of Aphaenogaster rudis, although rare. I collected a colony with 11 queens once, and saw the same thing; huge amounts of eggs, many times greater than a single queen could lay.
Ours appear to be monogynous. Tried fusing two colonies together a couple days ago, to see if our populations are polygynous. The workers got along well enough, yet they killed the smaller, recessive queen. I guess no polygynous Aphaenogaster for me.........
  • TennesseeAnts and Ants_Dakota like this

"God made..... all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. (including ants) And God saw that it was good. Genesis 1:25 NIV version


#8 Offline Ants_Dakota - Posted June 5 2020 - 7:38 AM

Ants_Dakota

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,059 posts
  • LocationSioux Falls, South Dakota
This really is fascinating. It would explain a lot if this is a different species.

Go to the ant, you sluggard; consider its ways and be wise! It has no commander, no overseer or ruler, yet it stores its provisions in summer and gathers its food at harvest. -Proverbs 6: 6-8

My South Dakotan Shop Here

Attention Ant-Keepers in South Dakota! Join the SoDak(Society Of Dakotan Ant Keepers)


#9 Offline CheetoLord02 - Posted August 28 2020 - 8:24 AM

CheetoLord02

    Vendor

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 781 posts
  • LocationMesa, AZ

A late update to this thread, but I can officially confirm that this population of A. fulva is inbreeding. The keeper in the area had collected a 5 queen colony a few months ago, but didn't really pay too much attention to them overall. He ended up trading them, and when he went to ship them out he noticed that they had not 5 queens, but 9! At some point they had made alates and bred in the nest. This is pretty exciting, as I don't believe Aphaenogaster have ever been known to breed in the nest.


  • Antkid12 likes this

#10 Offline James C. Trager - Posted March 7 2022 - 8:38 AM

James C. Trager

    Expert

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPip
  • 374 posts

Nice observations and documentation, CheetoLord02. 


  • CheetoLord02 likes this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users