Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

White Queens Next to the Main Queen


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 Offline AntRealm - Posted November 28 2025 - 10:35 AM

AntRealm

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts
Today I found this colony, which is probably Temnothorax parvulus.
My question is: what exactly are those small white wingless queens? I don’t think they’re alates since they don’t have wings at all.

Attached Images

  • IMG_۲۰۲۵۱۱۲۸_۲۲۰۱۱۹.jpg

Edited by AntRealm, November 28 2025 - 10:36 AM.


#2 Offline bmb1bee - Posted November 28 2025 - 10:48 AM

bmb1bee

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,161 posts
  • LocationHayward, CA

Today I found this colony, which is probably Temnothorax parvulus.
My question is: what exactly are those small white wingless queens? I don’t think they’re alates since they don’t have wings at all.

Pale means they're just callows. I'm not well-versed with T. parvulus, but wingless callows could mean that those queens don't engage in nuptial flights. I'm likely wrong though.


"Float like a butterfly sting like a bee, his eyes can't hit what the eyes can't see."
- Muhammad Ali

Check out my shop and Formica journal! Discord user is bmb1bee if you'd like to chat.

Also check out my YouTube channel: @bmb1bee


#3 Offline AntRealm - Posted November 28 2025 - 12:08 PM

AntRealm

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts


Today I found this colony, which is probably Temnothorax parvulus.
My question is: what exactly are those small white wingless queens? I don’t think they’re alates since they don’t have wings at all.

Pale means they're just callows. I'm not well-versed with T. parvulus, but wingless callows could mean that those queens don't engage in nuptial flights. I'm likely wrong though.
Yes, I know they’re newly emerged.But I had heard from a few sources that this species cannot be polygynous,
so that made me doubt it.

#4 Offline bmb1bee - Posted November 28 2025 - 3:05 PM

bmb1bee

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,161 posts
  • LocationHayward, CA

Yes, I know they’re newly emerged.But I had heard from a few sources that this species cannot be polygynous,

so that made me doubt it.

It could depend on population. First I've seen of wingless Temnothorax queen callows though.


"Float like a butterfly sting like a bee, his eyes can't hit what the eyes can't see."
- Muhammad Ali

Check out my shop and Formica journal! Discord user is bmb1bee if you'd like to chat.

Also check out my YouTube channel: @bmb1bee


#5 Offline An-Ant - Posted November 28 2025 - 6:23 PM

An-Ant

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

I'm not to sure if Temnothorax have them, but they could be intercastes.


Currently keeping:

Veromessor Andrei (red varient) x1, Tetramorium immigrans x4, and Solenopsis xyloni x1

 

Ants I NEED: 

Acromyrmex versicolor, Pheidole rhea, any Myrmecocystus


#6 Offline AntRealm - Posted November 29 2025 - 8:54 AM

AntRealm

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts
I managed to get some clearer photos of them.
They have wing attachment points on their thorax, but they don’t have any wings.
I also just noticed those three dots on their heads — does anyone know what they are?

Attached Images

  • IMG_۲۰۲۵۱۱۲۹_۱۵۳۰۰۱.jpg
  • IMG_۲۰۲۵۱۱۲۹_۱۵۳۲۳۰.jpg


#7 Offline Ants_Dakota - Posted November 29 2025 - 9:25 AM

Ants_Dakota

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,675 posts
  • LocationSioux Falls, South Dakota

Those three dots are called ocelli; all ants (to my knowledge) have them. They are sometimes called "simple eyes" to differentiate them from the two "compound eyes" we are familiar with. 


Edited by Ants_Dakota, November 29 2025 - 9:25 AM.

  • RushmoreAnts likes this

Go to the ant, you sluggard; consider its ways and be wise! It has no commander, no overseer or ruler, yet it stores its provisions in summer and gathers its food at harvest. -Proverbs 6: 6-8

My Ant Shop Here I have PPQ-526 permits to ship ants nationwide

Attention Ant-Keepers in South Dakota! Join the SoDak(Society Of Dakotan Ant Keepers)

My Formica sp. Journal

My Lasius sp. Journal

My Micro Ants Journal


#8 Offline RushmoreAnts - Posted November 29 2025 - 9:54 AM

RushmoreAnts

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,536 posts
  • LocationSioux Falls, South Dakota

Those three dots are called ocelli; all ants (to my knowledge) have them. They are sometimes called "simple eyes" to differentiate them from the two "compound eyes" we are familiar with. 

The ocelli's purpose is to distinguish light from darkness. They are the reason ants panic when you check on them, as they are sensitive to light. Their larger eyes can distinguish between objects like our eyes, although they're much more primitive. 


  • Ants_Dakota likes this

"God made..... all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds (including ants). And God saw that it was good. Genesis 1:25 NIV version

 

Keeping:

Tetramorium immigrans                                  Camponotus vicinus, modoc, novaeboracensis, herculeanus

Formica pallidefulva, argentea                        Solenopsis molesta

Formica cf. aserva                                          Lasius brevicornis, neoniger

Pheidole bicarinata

Lasius claviger


#9 Offline Stubyvast - Posted November 29 2025 - 11:35 AM

Stubyvast

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 334 posts
  • LocationBritish Columbia, Canada

Those are very strange queens, especially with those vestigial wings like that. I assume they weren't just bitten off or anything? 

After doing a bit of research, I agree with An-Ant that those could be intercaste queens, or something similar to it. I found a specific taxa of queens called "brachypterous" queens, where they eclose with very short wings that are often bitten off after emerging, leaving stubs like what we can see in these images. These queens eventually form new colonies through fission, and mating inside the nest, (bmb1bee mentioned this briefly).

The only problem with this is that there are no records from what I've looked into of any temnothorax queens engaging in this behaviour. I know basically next to nothing about this, but this would be my closest guess!


  • gs5248, bmb1bee and An-Ant like this

Manica invidia (1 queen,  ~200 workers)

Manica invidia (1 colonies, 1 queens plus 3 workers)

Lasius niger (single queen, ~200 workers - naturalistic, predatory set-up)

Lasius americanus (1 colony, ~10 workers)

Tetramorium immigrans (3 colonies, 3 queens, ~ five workers each | 1 colony, 1 queen, ~1200 workers)

Formica aserva (aserva queen, ~15  ​Formica neorufibarbis workers)

 

"And God made...everything that creeps on the ground according to its kind. 

And God saw that it was good." - Genesis 1:25

 


#10 Offline AntRealm - Posted December 15 2025 - 12:31 PM

AntRealm

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts
It’s been two weeks, and they’re still pale.

#11 Offline An-Ant - Posted December 15 2025 - 7:55 PM

An-Ant

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Very strange. Perhaps they are lacking a pigment?

With some quick research, I found this Antwiki article: https://www.antwiki....etal_IS2013.pdf

It's on Temnothorax nylanderi. Perhaps what's happening with your colony is similar to this?

The thing that surprises me the most is that the "queens" are still pale white. 


  • Stubyvast likes this

Currently keeping:

Veromessor Andrei (red varient) x1, Tetramorium immigrans x4, and Solenopsis xyloni x1

 

Ants I NEED: 

Acromyrmex versicolor, Pheidole rhea, any Myrmecocystus


#12 Offline Stubyvast - Posted December 17 2025 - 4:39 PM

Stubyvast

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 334 posts
  • LocationBritish Columbia, Canada

Ok, I guess to figure this out we should probably take a closer look at what exactly the species is. If there's a phenomena like this unique to that species, we can find out quicker and more accurately. AntRealm, could you potentially give us a closer shot of a queen so we can know 100% what species it is? 

 

Very strange. Perhaps they are lacking a pigment?

With some quick research, I found this Antwiki article: https://www.antwiki....etal_IS2013.pdf

It's on Temnothorax nylanderi. Perhaps what's happening with your colony is similar to this?

The thing that surprises me the most is that the "queens" are still pale white. 

 

An-Ant, I think you're correct, they clearly lack pigment. As far as I found out, most queens do not lack pigment except some cryptics with only subterranean lifestyles for the entire colony. So this is not normal. I also read the first bit of the article you mentioned, and you may be right that this could be some sort of accidental intercaste, just based on their lack of pigment and underdeveloped wings. 

If this is the case, though, and a queen intercaste is produced, wouldn't the colony cull them off if they're not polygynous?


  • An-Ant likes this

Manica invidia (1 queen,  ~200 workers)

Manica invidia (1 colonies, 1 queens plus 3 workers)

Lasius niger (single queen, ~200 workers - naturalistic, predatory set-up)

Lasius americanus (1 colony, ~10 workers)

Tetramorium immigrans (3 colonies, 3 queens, ~ five workers each | 1 colony, 1 queen, ~1200 workers)

Formica aserva (aserva queen, ~15  ​Formica neorufibarbis workers)

 

"And God made...everything that creeps on the ground according to its kind. 

And God saw that it was good." - Genesis 1:25

 


#13 Offline An-Ant - Posted December 17 2025 - 4:50 PM

An-Ant

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Those are very strange queens, especially with those vestigial wings like that. I assume they weren't just bitten off or anything? 

After doing a bit of research, I agree with An-Ant that those could be intercaste queens, or something similar to it. I found a specific taxa of queens called "brachypterous" queens, where they eclose with very short wings that are often bitten off after emerging, leaving stubs like what we can see in these images. These queens eventually form new colonies through fission, and mating inside the nest, (bmb1bee mentioned this briefly).

The only problem with this is that there are no records from what I've looked into of any temnothorax queens engaging in this behaviour. I know basically next to nothing about this, but this would be my closest guess!

Those are not brachypterous queens. If they were, the mesosoma would not be nearly as large, because brachypterous queens not only have none-functional wings, but also lack wing muscles.  

 

Ok, I guess to figure this out we should probably take a closer look at what exactly the species is. If there's a phenomena like this unique to that species, we can find out quicker and more accurately. AntRealm, could you potentially give us a closer shot of a queen so we can know 100% what species it is? 

 

Very strange. Perhaps they are lacking a pigment?

With some quick research, I found this Antwiki article: https://www.antwiki....etal_IS2013.pdf

It's on Temnothorax nylanderi. Perhaps what's happening with your colony is similar to this?

The thing that surprises me the most is that the "queens" are still pale white. 

 

An-Ant, I think you're correct, they clearly lack pigment. As far as I found out, most queens do not lack pigment except some cryptics with only subterranean lifestyles for the entire colony. So this is not normal. I also read the first bit of the article you mentioned, and you may be right that this could be some sort of accidental intercaste, just based on their lack of pigment and underdeveloped wings. 

If this is the case, though, and a queen intercaste is produced, wouldn't the colony cull them off if they're not polygynous?

I'm not sure, but I don't think a colony would cull intercastes. Additionally, even if the colony treated them as queen alates, the colony may not cull them for a few months. 


  • Stubyvast likes this

Currently keeping:

Veromessor Andrei (red varient) x1, Tetramorium immigrans x4, and Solenopsis xyloni x1

 

Ants I NEED: 

Acromyrmex versicolor, Pheidole rhea, any Myrmecocystus


#14 Offline AntRealm - Posted Yesterday, 12:48 PM

AntRealm

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts

Ok, I guess to figure this out we should probably take a closer look at what exactly the species is. If there's a phenomena like this unique to that species, we can find out quicker and more accurately. AntRealm, could you potentially give us a closer shot of a queen so we can know 100% what species it is?


Very strange. Perhaps they are lacking a pigment?
With some quick research, I found this Antwiki article: https://www.antwiki....etal_IS2013.pdf
It's on Temnothorax nylanderi. Perhaps what's happening with your colony is similar to this?
The thing that surprises me the most is that the "queens" are still pale white.


An-Ant, I think you're correct, they clearly lack pigment. As far as I found out, most queens do not lack pigment except some cryptics with only subterranean lifestyles for the entire colony. So this is not normal. I also read the first bit of the article you mentioned, and you may be right that this could be some sort of accidental intercaste, just based on their lack of pigment and underdeveloped wings.
If this is the case, though, and a queen intercaste is produced, wouldn't the colony cull them off if they're not polygynous?

Attached Images

  • file_000000001d00720cbe65bafe8389f926.png
  • file_0000000058a8720c83aaf285bc2d9c63 (1).png
  • file_00000000777c722fa8e6d814fb21cf2f.png

  • Stubyvast and An-Ant like this

#15 Offline Stubyvast - Posted Yesterday, 3:08 PM

Stubyvast

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 334 posts
  • LocationBritish Columbia, Canada

Thanks AntRealm! Ok can we confirm this ID? Beautiful photos by the way.


  • An-Ant likes this

Manica invidia (1 queen,  ~200 workers)

Manica invidia (1 colonies, 1 queens plus 3 workers)

Lasius niger (single queen, ~200 workers - naturalistic, predatory set-up)

Lasius americanus (1 colony, ~10 workers)

Tetramorium immigrans (3 colonies, 3 queens, ~ five workers each | 1 colony, 1 queen, ~1200 workers)

Formica aserva (aserva queen, ~15  ​Formica neorufibarbis workers)

 

"And God made...everything that creeps on the ground according to its kind. 

And God saw that it was good." - Genesis 1:25

 


#16 Offline AntRealm - Posted Yesterday, 4:48 PM

AntRealm

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts

Thanks AntRealm! Ok can we confirm this ID? Beautiful photos by the way.

Thanks. Actually, I tried to use artificial intelligence to increase the quality so they would be clearer

#17 Offline An-Ant - Posted Yesterday, 5:37 PM

An-Ant

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

 

Ok, I guess to figure this out we should probably take a closer look at what exactly the species is. If there's a phenomena like this unique to that species, we can find out quicker and more accurately. AntRealm, could you potentially give us a closer shot of a queen so we can know 100% what species it is?

Very strange. Perhaps they are lacking a pigment?
With some quick research, I found this Antwiki article: https://www.antwiki....etal_IS2013.pdf
It's on Temnothorax nylanderi. Perhaps what's happening with your colony is similar to this?
The thing that surprises me the most is that the "queens" are still pale white.


An-Ant, I think you're correct, they clearly lack pigment. As far as I found out, most queens do not lack pigment except some cryptics with only subterranean lifestyles for the entire colony. So this is not normal. I also read the first bit of the article you mentioned, and you may be right that this could be some sort of accidental intercaste, just based on their lack of pigment and underdeveloped wings.
If this is the case, though, and a queen intercaste is produced, wouldn't the colony cull them off if they're not polygynous?

 

Is it just me, or does only one of the "queens" have ocelli and wing muscles? This probably confirms these are intercastes. 

 

As for IDs, could you provide us with a general location where these were found? 


Currently keeping:

Veromessor Andrei (red varient) x1, Tetramorium immigrans x4, and Solenopsis xyloni x1

 

Ants I NEED: 

Acromyrmex versicolor, Pheidole rhea, any Myrmecocystus


#18 Offline AntRealm - Posted Today, 2:20 AM

AntRealm

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts


Ok, I guess to figure this out we should probably take a closer look at what exactly the species is. If there's a phenomena like this unique to that species, we can find out quicker and more accurately. AntRealm, could you potentially give us a closer shot of a queen so we can know 100% what species it is?

Very strange. Perhaps they are lacking a pigment?
With some quick research, I found this Antwiki article: https://www.antwiki....etal_IS2013.pdf
It's on Temnothorax nylanderi. Perhaps what's happening with your colony is similar to this?
The thing that surprises me the most is that the "queens" are still pale white.

An-Ant, I think you're correct, they clearly lack pigment. As far as I found out, most queens do not lack pigment except some cryptics with only subterranean lifestyles for the entire colony. So this is not normal. I also read the first bit of the article you mentioned, and you may be right that this could be some sort of accidental intercaste, just based on their lack of pigment and underdeveloped wings.
If this is the case, though, and a queen intercaste is produced, wouldn't the colony cull them off if they're not polygynous?
Is it just me, or does only one of the "queens" have ocelli and wing muscles? This probably confirms these are intercastes.

As for IDs, could you provide us with a general location where these were found?
Iran, south of the Caspian Sea. Found in a forested area with soft soil. They were discovered under a rotting bag, near an Aphaenogaster colony—actually very close to it, near the aggregation chamber.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users