Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

Two different ant species that may actually help each other


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Offline OhNoNotAgain - Posted July 24 2021 - 10:35 PM

OhNoNotAgain

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,134 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Argentine Ant Territory
https://www.newscien...er-in-one-nest/

Kind of unusual to read about two species that may be mutualistic.
In this case Platythyrea conradti builds and the much smaller Strumigenys maynei acts as small yappy guard dog.
  • Ecan and olookitsme like this

Past & Present

Veromessor pergandei, andrei, stoddardi; Novomessor cockerelli

Camponotus fragilis, Camponotus sansabeanus (inactive), vicinus, laevigatus/quercicola, CA02

Pogonomyrmex subnitidus, P. californicus (inactive)

Liometopum occidentale (inactive); Prenolepis imparis; Myrmecocystus mexicanus (inactive); Tetramorium sp. (inactive);  Lasius sp.

 

Termites: Zootermopsis angusticollis, and a box of drywood termites that can't be seen

Isopods: (most no longer keeping) A. gestroi, granulatum, kluugi, maculatum, vulgare; C. murina; P. hoffmannseggi, P. haasi, P. ornatus; V. parvus, P. pruinosus, T. tomentosa

Spoods: (no longer keeping) Phidippus sp., other


#2 Offline Antkeeper01 - Posted July 24 2021 - 10:39 PM

Antkeeper01

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,392 posts
  • LocationA random state in the US

interesting


1X Pogonomyrmex occidentalis 40-50 Workers

1X Solenopsis molesta 10 Workers (mono)

Ants I Want: Crematogaster sp, Camponotus Sp., Ponera Pennsylvanica, Mymercocystus sp.

 

My Youtube channel: https://www.youtube....kUjx-dPFMyVqOLw

 

 Join Our Fledgling Discord Server https://discord.com/...089056687423489


#3 Offline ConcordAntman - Posted July 25 2021 - 11:46 AM

ConcordAntman

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 770 posts
  • LocationMassachusetts

Interesting! This may not be an uncommon occurrence. Last summer I came upon two species of widely divergent size in my patio that appeared to be cooperatively foraging to the point of the smaller species venturing un-challenged, into the larger species’ nest. I couldn’t believe this hadn’t sparked an all out war. It got me to reading and I came upon this paper:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/3565636

 

I summarized it here: https://www.formicul...orage/?p=160173

It’s a small step from positioning one’s colony nearby for cooperative foraging to cohabitation. 


Edited by ConcordAntman, July 25 2021 - 5:56 PM.


#4 Offline cap_backfire - Posted July 29 2021 - 7:15 AM

cap_backfire

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 289 posts
  • LocationMunster, IN

Super interesting.   Hmmm...   Wonder what all the benefits are.   



#5 Offline ConcordAntman - Posted July 29 2021 - 4:51 PM

ConcordAntman

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 770 posts
  • LocationMassachusetts

In regards to the paper, starting with the three broad hierarchical groups; territorials (who protect their nest, food resources, and territory), encounterers (who protect their nest and food resources), and submissives (who protect only their nest). Submissives find protection and potentially access to food resources the territorials by living near territorials since the territorials control the space while the territorials don’t perceive the submissives as a threat. The same isn’t true for the encounterers since there would be conflict with territorials over food resources, but the encounterers and submissives could coexist and still gain an element of protection while not being perceived as a threat. Two submissives could also coexist and share food resources.


  • cap_backfire likes this




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users