Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

Chillicothe area Ohio 6/7/19


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Offline madbiologist - Posted July 6 2019 - 8:02 PM

madbiologist

    Vendor

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 423 posts
  • LocationOhio
A parasitic Formica queen I caught on 6/2/19 in a woodland area. She is 12-14mm long, and was caught in the afternoon. She's got a red circle where the gaster meets the mesosoma.b71febbbda495b535224e5d94e5a089b.jpg64a01b7f6e68029bdd90314a374c4ed2.jpg

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
  • rbarreto likes this

#2 Offline rbarreto - Posted July 6 2019 - 8:03 PM

rbarreto

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 645 posts
  • LocationOttawa, On
@AntsBC will probably know. Very beautiful queen.
  • AntsBC likes this

My journal featuring most of my ants.

My other journal featuring Formica Bradleyi.

Check our my store here!


#3 Offline AntsBC - Posted July 6 2019 - 8:39 PM

AntsBC

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 317 posts
  • LocationBritish Columbia, Canada

This is the same species as the other specimen you posted an ID thread on; Formica integra

 

There are only two other species in the Formica rufa group present in Ohio:

 

Formica prociliata and Formica obscuriventris
 
We can easily rule out F. prociliata due to the fact that their queen's have stringy hairs on the sides of their mesosoma, and many other characteristics that don't match with this specimen. 
 
We can rule out F. obscuriventris due to the fact that their queen's have small setae present on the mesosoma (a characteristic that this specimen and F. integra do not possess), a slightly rougher surface then F. integra and a somewhat differently shaped head. The distinguishing characteristic is the foremost, though.
 
This explanation goes for the other ID thread you posted, as well.

Edited by AntsBC, July 6 2019 - 9:32 PM.

  • rbarreto and madbiologist like this

My Active Journals:

 

Formica pacifica

Formica planipilis (Parasitic sp.)

 

Instagram // YouTube 


#4 Offline madbiologist - Posted July 7 2019 - 6:44 AM

madbiologist

    Vendor

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 423 posts
  • LocationOhio

This is the same species as the other specimen you posted an ID thread on; Formica integra.

There are only two other species in the Formica rufa group present in Ohio:

Formica prociliata and Formica obscuriventris

We can easily rule out F. prociliata due to the fact that their queen's have stringy hairs on the sides of their mesosoma, and many other characteristics that don't match with this specimen.

We can rule out F. obscuriventris due to the fact that their queen's have small setae present on the mesosoma (a characteristic that this specimen and F. integra do not possess), a slightly rougher surface then F. integra and a somewhat differently shaped head. The distinguishing characteristic is the foremost, though.

This explanation goes for the other ID thread you posted, as well.

Thanks.

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

#5 Offline Zeiss - Posted July 7 2019 - 3:26 PM

Zeiss

    Advanced Member

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,226 posts
  • LocationFountain Valley

Please follow proper ID request formatting as obviously put at the top of the request thread.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users