Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

"Experimental evidence that the introduced fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, does not competitively suppress co-occurring ants in a disturbed habitat."


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 Offline Myrmicinae - Posted January 15 2015 - 11:30 AM

Myrmicinae

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 274 posts
  • LocationFort Collins, CO
I haven't had a chance to read the entire article, but it presents some very interesting findings that I wanted to share.  
 
 
Apparently, the study suggests that Solenopsis invicta colonies do not directly reduce the diversity of ant species in a given habitat.  Their dominance seems to be simply due to a better ability to adapt to disturbed sites, compared to native species.
 
Perhaps a good number of ant species that are considered "invasive" are in fact only "disturbance specialists."  Anyway, I thought that everyone might be interested in this concept.   To prevent spread of invasive ants, the most important component might be habitat restoration.

Edited by Myrmicinae, January 15 2015 - 11:41 AM.

  • drtrmiller, ctantkeeper, LC3 and 3 others like this
Journals on Formiculture:
Pheidole ceres
Tapinoma sessile

Old YouTube Channel:
ColoradoAnts

#2 Offline drtrmiller - Posted January 15 2015 - 11:38 AM

drtrmiller

    Vendor

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,714 posts

The premise seems plainly obvious.

 

Nice to see the research, however.


Edited by drtrmiller, January 15 2015 - 11:55 AM.



byFormica® is the manufacturer of the iconic nectar feeders and Sunburst Ant Nectar.
byFormica ant products always deliver consistent performance, convenience,
and reliability, making them among the most beloved ant foods and kit enjoyed by
ant keeping enthusiasts worldwide. For more information, visit www.byFormica.com.

#3 Offline Mercutia - Posted January 15 2015 - 11:39 AM

Mercutia

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 621 posts
  • LocationToronto, Canada

Link is leading to "Not Found" for me. D:



#4 Offline Miles - Posted January 15 2015 - 11:40 AM

Miles

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 540 posts
  • LocationFlorida & Arizona

Link is leading to "Not Found" for me. D:

Same here.


PhD Student & NSF Graduate Research Fellow | University of Florida Dept. of Entomology & Nematology - Lucky Ant Lab 

 

Founder & Director of The Ant Network. Ant keeper since 2009. Insect ecologist and science communicator. He/Him.


#5 Offline Myrmicinae - Posted January 15 2015 - 11:42 AM

Myrmicinae

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 274 posts
  • LocationFort Collins, CO

Edited.  Let me know if it works now.


Journals on Formiculture:
Pheidole ceres
Tapinoma sessile

Old YouTube Channel:
ColoradoAnts

#6 Offline Myrmicinae - Posted January 15 2015 - 11:49 AM

Myrmicinae

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 274 posts
  • LocationFort Collins, CO

The premise seems plainly obvious.

 

Nice to see the research, however.

 

By the way, there is a problem with your link.

 

This is the first carefully controlled study that I have found to clearly demonstrate the relationship.  I wanted to share it because many people believe that invasive species are the sole cause of native ant decline.


Journals on Formiculture:
Pheidole ceres
Tapinoma sessile

Old YouTube Channel:
ColoradoAnts

#7 Offline drtrmiller - Posted January 15 2015 - 11:54 AM

drtrmiller

    Vendor

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,714 posts

 

The premise seems plainly obvious.

 

Nice to see the research, however.

 

This is the first carefully controlled study that I have found to clearly demonstrate the relationship.  I wanted to share it because many people believe that invasive species are the sole cause of native ant decline.

 

 

I would speculate that polygyne species that show little intraspecific aggression, such as Linepithema humile, Pheidole megacephala, Nylanderia fulva, etc., are much more likely to cause a decline in diversity of native ant species, than Solenopsis invicta, which generally competes as much with itself, as it does with other ants.  

 

Polygyne variants of S. invicta and other Solenopsis spp. are likely to be more problematic, albeit geographically isolated, in their disruption of native ant fauna.


Edited by drtrmiller, January 15 2015 - 12:04 PM.



byFormica® is the manufacturer of the iconic nectar feeders and Sunburst Ant Nectar.
byFormica ant products always deliver consistent performance, convenience,
and reliability, making them among the most beloved ant foods and kit enjoyed by
ant keeping enthusiasts worldwide. For more information, visit www.byFormica.com.

#8 Offline Myrmicinae - Posted January 15 2015 - 12:10 PM

Myrmicinae

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 274 posts
  • LocationFort Collins, CO

 

 

The premise seems plainly obvious.

 

Nice to see the research, however.

 

This is the first carefully controlled study that I have found to clearly demonstrate the relationship.  I wanted to share it because many people believe that invasive species are the sole cause of native ant decline.

 

 

I would speculate that polygyne species that show little intraspecific aggression, such as Linepithema humile, Pheidole megacephala, Nylanderia fulva, etc., are much more likely to cause a decline in diversity of native ant species, than Solenopsis invicta, which generally competes as much with itself, as it does with other ants.  

 

Polygyne variants of S. invicta and other Solenopsis spp. are likely to be more problematic, albeit geographically isolated, in their disruption of native ant fauna.

 

 

Agreed.  Supercolonial species have a huge competitive advantage after their populations reach a certain size.  However, I think that habitat disturbance probably plays a major role in their initial establishment and expansion.


Edited by Myrmicinae, January 15 2015 - 12:11 PM.

Journals on Formiculture:
Pheidole ceres
Tapinoma sessile

Old YouTube Channel:
ColoradoAnts

#9 Offline Myrmicinae - Posted January 30 2015 - 5:41 PM

Myrmicinae

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 274 posts
  • LocationFort Collins, CO

Here is an interesting video that documents some of the research.

 


Journals on Formiculture:
Pheidole ceres
Tapinoma sessile

Old YouTube Channel:
ColoradoAnts

#10 Offline dspdrew - Posted January 30 2015 - 6:12 PM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

Interesting. I see they seem to favor the test tube. :)



#11 Offline kalimant - Posted December 10 2017 - 4:05 PM

kalimant

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 41 posts
  • LocationNY, USA

 

 

The premise seems plainly obvious.

 

Nice to see the research, however.

 

This is the first carefully controlled study that I have found to clearly demonstrate the relationship.  I wanted to share it because many people believe that invasive species are the sole cause of native ant decline.

 

 

I would speculate that polygyne species that show little intraspecific aggression, such as Linepithema humile, Pheidole megacephala, Nylanderia fulva, etc., are much more likely to cause a decline in diversity of native ant species, than Solenopsis invicta, which generally competes as much with itself, as it does with other ants.  

 

Polygyne variants of S. invicta and other Solenopsis spp. are likely to be more problematic, albeit geographically isolated, in their disruption of native ant fauna.

 

 

yep, various studies have shown that L. humile and P. megacephala  definitely cause a significant reduction in native ant diversity...not only in disturbed habitats, but in the case of P. megacephala at least, also in undisturbed local habitats (e.g. in Brisbane and Perth Australia). They do this not only by outcompeting the native ants in terms of finding and dominating food resources, but also (in the case of P. megacephala) by raiding the colonies of competitors around them.


I currently maintain a site dedicated to the study of Pheidole megacephala:

 

The Pheidole megacephala Journal

 

 

 


#12 Offline gcsnelling - Posted December 10 2017 - 4:36 PM

gcsnelling

    Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,651 posts

I have not yet had a chance to read the paper, but I know both authors and would put a good bit of faith in their conclusions.



#13 Offline kalimant - Posted February 23 2018 - 8:09 PM

kalimant

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 41 posts
  • LocationNY, USA

I have not yet had a chance to read the paper, but I know both authors and would put a good bit of faith in their conclusions.

 

the weird thing is that i've never actually come across a paper that said S. invicta impacts surrounding ants significantly (though i read that S. invicta does displace S. geminata)....might be because i don't look for them though....i do know the stricter unicolonial ants are more likely to displace ant competitors, and in those cases there are a lot of evidence (mostly non-experimental, although there have been situations where an invasive species has been wiped out deliberately, and this  created a much richer ant assemblage)


Edited by kalimant, February 23 2018 - 8:10 PM.

I currently maintain a site dedicated to the study of Pheidole megacephala:

 

The Pheidole megacephala Journal

 

 

 


#14 Offline kalimant - Posted May 12 2018 - 12:31 PM

kalimant

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 41 posts
  • LocationNY, USA

yep, various studies have shown that L. humile and P. megacephala  definitely cause a significant reduction in native ant diversity...not only in disturbed habitats, but in the case of P. megacephala at least, also in undisturbed local habitats (e.g. in Brisbane and Perth Australia). They do this not only by outcompeting the native ants in terms of finding and dominating food resources, but also (in the case of P. megacephala) by raiding the colonies of competitors around them.

 

 

 

three papers where P. megacephala was removed, which allowed the restoration of native species or the introduction of other invasives (which had been earlier excluded by the ant)
 

HETERICK, B.E., CASELLA, J. & MAJER, J.D. 2000: Influence of Argentine and coastal brown ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) invasions on ant communities in Perth gardens, Western Australia. – Urban Ecosystems 4: 277-292.
 
Hoffmann BD (2010) Ecological restoration following the local eradication of an invasive ant in northern Australia. Biol. Invasions 12:959–969.
 
Sheldon Plentovich, Jakob Eijzeng, Heather Eijzeng, David Smith (2011). Indirect effects of ant eradication efforts on offshore islets in the Hawaiian Archipelago. Biol Invasions 13:545–557

  • gcsnelling likes this

I currently maintain a site dedicated to the study of Pheidole megacephala:

 

The Pheidole megacephala Journal

 

 

 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users