Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

ID of workers found in orchard - 20.04.2018.


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Offline GeorgeK - Posted April 20 2018 - 7:05 AM

GeorgeK

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 189 posts
  • LocationSiberia

So while this is not queen ID, its worker ID. I found workers at cherry tree foraging, so i`d like to have them ID so i know when to expect queens of this species

1. Location (on a map) of collection: Northern Serbia, Orchard
2. Date of collection:  20.04.2018.
3. Habitat of collection: Grassland with trees
4. Length (from head to gaster): Around 6mm
5. Color, hue, pattern and texture: Head is black, thorax is brownish/orange and abdomen in black with two pairs of white dots at front of abdomen (visible in picture)
6. Distinguishing characteristics: White dots on abdomen?
7. Distinguishing behavior: -
8. Nest description: Probably wood

9. Nuptial flight time and date: -

Picture:

zQKEg89

zVyL8GP


Edited by GeorgeK, April 20 2018 - 7:06 AM.


#2 Offline LC3 - Posted April 20 2018 - 8:34 AM

LC3

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,323 posts
  • LocationBC, Canada
Although the pics are (no offense) really terrible I’m going to guess and say this is a Formic sp.

#3 Offline Ants4fun - Posted April 20 2018 - 8:35 AM

Ants4fun

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,142 posts
  • LocationSouth Dakota
Those pictures are very dark, and one can only really see the outline. I suggest you take some better pictures for an accurate ID.

#4 Offline GeorgeK - Posted April 20 2018 - 8:35 AM

GeorgeK

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 189 posts
  • LocationSiberia

Although the pics are (no offense) really terrible I’m going to guess and say this is a Formic sp.

Even latvian had more potatoes than this pictures have pixels, i know that. They were quite good on the phone tho


  • Martialis likes this

#5 Offline GeorgeK - Posted April 20 2018 - 8:43 AM

GeorgeK

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 189 posts
  • LocationSiberia

Hopefully this pictures are better https://imgur.com/a/Ue1nTcZ



#6 Offline VoidElecent - Posted April 20 2018 - 9:01 AM

VoidElecent

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,339 posts
  • LocationPhiladelphia, PA.

These aren't Formica, they're Dolichoderus quadripunctatus! One of the most beautiful species in existence, in my opinion. What an awesome find.


Edited by VoidElecent, April 20 2018 - 9:01 AM.

  • LC3, noebl1 and GeorgeK like this

#7 Offline GeorgeK - Posted April 20 2018 - 10:10 AM

GeorgeK

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 189 posts
  • LocationSiberia

These aren't Formica, they're Dolichoderus quadripunctatus! One of the most beautiful species in existence, in my opinion. What an awesome find.

That would be correct by the pics i found on the internet, thanks for the help! I also find them to be very beautiful, hence the reason i wanted to know species to check when they fly. Flights are from mid july till the end of september. Would be nice if i knew the conditions in which they flew tho



#8 Offline LC3 - Posted April 20 2018 - 10:14 AM

LC3

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,323 posts
  • LocationBC, Canada

Although the pics are (no offense) really terrible I’m going to guess and say this is a Formic sp.

Even latvian had more potatoes than this pictures have pixels, i know that. They were quite good on the phone tho

Sorry I’m using mobile and turns out my brightness was too low. Agreed these pics aren’t terrible.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users