Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

Lasius sp. fertile or not?

lasius

  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 Offline dspdrew - Posted October 31 2013 - 7:31 PM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

I found a Lasius sp. alate back around June 22nd 2013, as you can see here in this ID thread. After a month and a half went by with nothing but eggs, I suddenly noticed two larvae. Now it's been about two months since then, and these larvae continue to grow, but VERY, VERY slowly. Here is what I have at this point.

IMAG2198.jpg


Does anybody know what might be going on with her?



#2 Offline Crystals - Posted November 1 2013 - 10:55 AM

Crystals

    Advanced Member

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,048 posts
  • LocationAthabasca, AB (Canada)

Considering you are in California and I am in AB, Canada; things may be different.

 

In Alberta the Lasius overwinter their larvae from September until April.  They don't eat or anything.  Even if you leave them on a heating cable the larvae in my colonies still won't develop.  Beats me how they know, but they do.

 

I have noticed that my Lasius are also very slow to grow, the eggs the queen laid in late June barely reached larval stage by mid August.  Once they reached the larval stage they did grow a bit more quickly, but by mid-september mine stopped developing in preparation of winter.

 

As long as they are developing and not dieing, I wouldn't worry too much.  If you are really worried, you could try to find 1-2 pupae and boost her.  I wouldn't add more than 2, as she may neglect her brood.


"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astound the rest." -- Samuel Clemens

 

List of Handy Links   (pinned in the General section)

My Colonies


#3 Offline uso - Posted December 3 2013 - 8:46 PM

uso

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts
  • LocationGeorgia

This doesn't look like a Lasius to me, it's really strange-looking. I think it might be Plagiolepis:

 

http://www.antweb.or...project=calants



#4 Offline dspdrew - Posted December 4 2013 - 6:07 AM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

This doesn't look like a Lasius to me, it's really strange-looking. I think it might be Plagiolepis:

 

http://www.antweb.or...project=calants

Just to be sure, you did look at the original ID thread right, there's a lot of pictures? It's actually the one where Doctorant thought it wasn't Lasius, but you actually disagreed with him. Now I'm a little confused. lol



#5 Offline uso - Posted December 4 2013 - 6:59 PM

uso

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts
  • LocationGeorgia

I forgot about that, I'm really sorry!

 

Looking back at the old ID thread the mix-up seems to be about the ID of the workers rather than the queen. Those workers are still definitely Lasius. I think all of us made a mistake in glossing over the queen for whatever reason. The smooth shininess, elongated proportions, and shallow thorax, as well as head size and shape, make me believe that Plagiolepis is more suitable of a label for this queen than Lasius. Run that by the people at TAFMF and see if they agree or disagree. Unfortunately I can't access Antweb right now.



#6 Offline dspdrew - Posted December 4 2013 - 7:18 PM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

That queen in that original thread was actually from that same nest that the workers were from, so whatever they are, they certainly should be the same species.  :thinking: In one of the pictures, you can see all the alates around the entrance. And yeah, Antweb appears to be down right now.



#7 Offline wook - Posted December 5 2013 - 1:31 PM

wook

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 126 posts
  • LocationSarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

I agree with uso, Lasius do not look like that. (As I stated already :P); Queen is rather Liometopum than Lasius, but my first idea was *wildcard*lepis.


...:::]|wook|[:::...


#8 Offline dspdrew - Posted December 5 2013 - 1:52 PM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

I agree with uso, Lasius do not look like that. (As I stated already :P); Queen is rather Liometopum than Lasius, but my first idea was *wildcard*lepis.

Have you not read the original ID thread too?



#9 Offline wook - Posted December 5 2013 - 4:31 PM

wook

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 126 posts
  • LocationSarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Have you not read the original ID thread too?

/me's too lazy to read bunch of "could be" thingies :D


...:::]|wook|[:::...


#10 Offline dspdrew - Posted December 5 2013 - 8:08 PM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

/me's too lazy to read bunch of "could be" thingies :D

That would explain.



#11 Offline uso - Posted December 6 2013 - 11:28 PM

uso

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts
  • LocationGeorgia

So for the first time this week I'll be able to actually sit down and think this through in more detail. Your queen seems to have 12 (?) antennal segments, while every picture of Plagiolepis allaudi queens and workers I can find has 11. The eyes on your queen also seem to be smaller, and the queen, now that I am able to take my time on this, is also way to big to be Plagiolepis, so sorry about that.

 

What I can't figure out, though, is why her profile looks so long and flattened in all the pictures, which led me to yell Plagiolepis prematurely. Plagiolepis is the only ant I know of in California, not that I've ever been there, that has that sort of weird look. It's in the size range of Lasius and has a Lasius-looking head. Maybe just perspective? There is something weird going on with her head in the picture at the top of this thread though. And in her last picture in the ID thread on TAFMF, her thorax almost looks like something sliced off the top of it or something.

 

So basically, I'm sorry to hijack an antkeeping thread and turn it into an ID thread, and I have barely looked at or thought about ants for months. At the same time, she's a really weird looking queen. I just don't know what to think anymore, and I need to stop trying pull off ID things like this at 2:30 am.



#12 Offline dspdrew - Posted December 7 2013 - 6:31 AM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

So basically, I'm sorry to hijack an antkeeping thread and turn it into an ID thread, and I have barely looked at or thought about ants for months.

Don't worry about it, I never got a proper ID anyways, so it's all good. After looking though the pictures again, I'm pretty sure I can get much better pictures of her now. She also doesn't have wings any more either, so that should help.



#13 Offline dspdrew - Posted December 7 2013 - 11:23 AM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

And here they are.

 

IMGP0004.jpg

 

IMGP0011.jpg

 

IMGP0012.jpg

 

IMGP0029.jpg

 

IMGP0032.jpg

 

IMGP0040.jpg

 

IMGP0017.jpg

 

IMGP0067.jpg

 

IMGP0068.jpg

 

IMGP0041.jpg

 

IMGP0052.jpg

 

IMGP0055.jpg

 

 

As you can see it seems to be eating well, even without any workers. It's been without workers for almost six months now. :unknown:



#14 Offline wook - Posted December 7 2013 - 11:52 AM

wook

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 126 posts
  • LocationSarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

I would say it has 11 segments, and I would also say that its thorax is too thin for Lasius. Only Liometopum has such thorax, but mandibles and head is different. My next assumption would be Nylanderia.


...:::]|wook|[:::...


#15 Offline dspdrew - Posted December 7 2013 - 11:55 AM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

There's clearly 12 segments (remember the scape is one also). And again, like I mentioned, you might want to check the original ID thread; this queen is 7mm in length. %)



#16 Offline wook - Posted December 7 2013 - 12:08 PM

wook

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 126 posts
  • LocationSarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Sorry, 11 funiculus. However, either 7mm or 27mm thorax is too thin for Lasius.


...:::]|wook|[:::...


#17 Offline dspdrew - Posted December 27 2013 - 2:12 PM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

After looking at these pictures more, it looks like this thing might have 13 antennal segments. :huh:



#18 Offline dspdrew - Posted December 29 2013 - 9:26 AM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

Ok, so after looking at the new pictures, Dr James Trager says this is definitely Lasius, and maybe L. crypticus.



#19 Offline dspdrew - Posted January 20 2014 - 11:51 PM

dspdrew
  • LocationSanta Ana, CA

This queen died, so hopefully I'll find more next season.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: lasius

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users